An outside reviewer has no interest in protecting a long-standing partner relationship or a past appointment decision, so findings can be reported as they are. That matters when the team closest to a distributor is also the team whose judgement a review might question, or when a partner has become hard to challenge simply because it has been in place for years.
Partner reports are not the same as market evidence. Sales figures supplied by a distributor can overstate performance, particularly as a contract renewal approaches. Checking coverage and pricing in the market itself, through retail and online visibility, and cross-checking claims against independent sources where they exist, gives a basis for decisions that does not depend on the partner’s own account.
Specific, documented gaps are also more useful than a general sense that something is wrong. They give a stronger basis for renegotiating terms, surface coverage and pricing problems before they become larger revenue shortfalls, and make the next move, whether adding partners, replacing one or consolidating, a decision grounded in evidence.